If you’re going to emulate some legendary hardware, working with the original manufacturer is an excellent place to start. IK Multimedia put this collection together in collaboration with TASCAM for their 50th anniversary.
Read more in our IK Multimedia T-RackS TASCAM Tape Collection review and enter the giveaway to win a FREE copy of the software.
Recreating the sound of vintage hardware in plugin form can be a thankless task at times. Some purists will tell you it sounds awful before they even hear it. Personally, I like to take each on individual merit; some are terrible, some are good, and now and then, some are remarkably good.
The TASCAM Tape Collection got my attention when it was announced, so I’m delighted to have the chance to check it out.
T-RackS TASCAM Tape Collection – What’s in the Collection?
The collection features four vintage tape machines and has an introductory price of €129.99 (usually €199.99).
TEAC A-6100 MKII
The TEAC A-6100 MKII arrived on the scene in 1973 as one of the first tape machines made specifically for mastering.
It’s the most subtle of the four, and you have to make more significant adjustments to get more noticeable changes. It adds instant authenticity with the right amount of tape saturation and compression.
TEAC A-3340S
The 1972 A-3340S was the first four-track recorder that featured synchronized overdubbing.
When used with the 911 tape formulation, it delivers the definitive tape sound with saturation that can be warm or more aggressive when pushed.
TASCAM 388
The TASCAM 388 eight-track recorder came around in 1985.
Of the four, the 388 provides the most comprehensive scope for creative tweaking, thanks largely to the three-band EQ.
TASCAM Porta One
The four-track TASCAM Porta One MiniStudio looks and sounds like the 80s/90s.
I’m not just bundling two decades of sound together, but I’m talking about that boombox image. It makes me think of movies like Do the Right Thing, and it’s great on Hip Hop, New Jack Swing, etc.
IK Multimedia says TEAC and TASCAM selected the most sought-after models from their history, which is no surprise. They then sourced the most pristine example of each unit available and fully restored them to factory specification.
Spectrasonics did a similar thing on a larger scale with 36 vintage keyboard instruments for Keyscape.
The behavior and performance of vintage gear aren’t always consistent from one unit to another, so multiple hardware owners could have slightly different expectations of how something should sound. What I like most about this collection is that it starts with the sound and performance that the manufacturer intended all those years ago.
Having the original manufacturer’s seal of approval doesn’t guarantee success, but it certainly doesn’t hurt.
Using T-RackS TASCAM Tape Collection
The first thing to note is that you can open these plugins inside the T-Racks 5 shell or individually in your DAW.
As far as image goes, I think these plugins look great, and that’s pretty common with IK Multimedia. Good looks aren’t essential, but when a plugin looks clunky or has a strange/tedious layout, it becomes less appealing to use; these GUIs are fully resizable too, which is always nice.
The layout of each plugin follows the design of the original tape machines pretty closely, minus a few adjustments for plugin form. Each plugin also shares the same set of controls, with just a few slight differences.
The shared controls allow you to quickly become more confident with all four plugins, especially for users new to tape machine plugins. Instead of struggling with too many controls, you can focus on how each plugin sounds and reacts.
The TEAC machines have Record and Play sections, the TASCAM machines have Record and EQ sections, including some of the most important controls.
In the Record sections, you’ll find Bias, Level, and HF EQ. In conjunction with the main Input, these three controls let you bring out varied effects of the recording head. Pushing the Record Level will result in more obvious saturation, and the HF EQ can either highlight or compensate for the loss of high-frequency content with magnetic tape recorders.
The Bias is a bit more interesting; generally, Bias on a tape machine provides optimal fidelity through a more linear magnetic transfer. Increasing the Bias will typically produce a warmer sound with more saturation; reducing it will typically enhance any non-linear effects like distortion.
You don’t have to adjust the Bias, but it’s something that is often used exaggeratedly.
There is an Input/Repro switch that determines whether your signal goes through the whole analog recording system or just the electronic input/output stages. I can see why people might like both options, with Input being more transparent.
But, for me, I doubt I’d stray from Repro because you can still be subtle without losing any of the tape machine processes.
I love the EQ in the Record and Play stages; even if they are subtle, you can do a lot of fine-tuning, avoiding the need for another plugin.
The TASCAM Porta One has the same EQ as the TEAC models (Play), but the 388 has a three-band EQ with a wide frequency range.
True Stereo recreates the subtle variation between left and right channels that you’d expect from a tape machine. The variation isn’t overwhelmingly noticeable, but it’s part of the analog charm. You can disable it if you prefer to keep both channels identical.
Transport Modeling mimics the behavior of the mechanical transport, which increases the likelihood of very slight irregularities.
Features like True Stereo and Transport Modeling are amongst my favorite things about this collection.
I say that for a couple of reasons; firstly, it’s an example of how IK Multimedia modeled each part of these tape machines in great detail. It’s about recreating the interaction between those different parts that play a role in the final sound.
Secondly, when developers add such features, they sometimes exaggerate them as if that validates their inclusion more. When that happens, you end up with something that sounds false and gimmicky; that’s not the case here.
The Tape Speed is shown on each machine as Low and High, representing 7.5 and 15 inches per second (IPS), respectively. Setting the Tape Speed has a lot to do with the desired sound and the style of music in question. I prefer the Slow speed because it sounds warmer and less clinical, but the increased fidelity of the High speed works well, too, particularly with a more modern sound.
The TASCAM 388 has no Tape Speed controls.
Magic Formulas
There are five tape formulations in total. Each machine offers four of those formulations, with the selection varying from one machine to another. The TASCAM Porta One is the exception, which offers two cassette tape formulations (Type I and Type II). As a nice little aesthetically pleasing feature, you’ll see the tape change on the GUI when you select different formulations.
Here are the formulations and their defining characteristics:
- 35 – Balance between precision and warmth of the TASCAM 388.
- 911 – Balance between precision and warmth on the TEAC machines.
- 456 – The most commonly used and definitive tape sound.
- GP9 – Punchy and modern.
- 499 – Analog sound with minimal distortion/compression and enhanced HF definition.
The impact of changing formulation depends on the machine you are using and how you have it set up. With default settings, the effect of changes is fairly minimal; you’ll hear it, but it’s not a drastic change. You notice a subtle but steady transition from a warmer or darker sound to a more open and modern sound as you cycle through the selections.
The two cassette tape types of the Porta One have more distinct characteristics. Type I (normal bias) has an apparent Lo-Fi sound, and Type II has a cleaner sound.
CPU-Unfriendly
I want to touch on this briefly because it’s to be expected. With many moving parts (processing), the trade-off is higher CPU usage; this is true of these plugins. It’s not going to cripple your project in any way, but you wouldn’t want to have too many instances running. Even if the CPU usage was far less, these plugins aren’t ones that you’d want all over everything in your mix anyway.
T-RackS TASCAM Tape Collection – Final Thoughts
I don’t own any of these tape machines in hardware form, so I’m not making direct comparisons. I’ve heard people saying bluntly, it’s not as good as the real thing, and I’ll agree, that’s fine.
Without ever using a real TEAC A-6100 MkII, if offered the machine or the plugin, I’ll take the machine. However, I find it ridiculous that people who make it clear they are hardware-only purists take the time to comment so passionately on plugins; just don’t buy it.
Anyone who is open to software will know that emulations are getting better and better. The trouble isn’t so much creating a good sound; it’s mimicking the inconsistencies of an analog machine, and the relationship between each stage; that’s where I think IK has done a fantastic job.
I love how they sound, and I love that they aren’t as obvious/intrusive as many other tape emulations. I think they sound very close to the original units (as far as I can without owning one), and it’s fantastic when you add the convenience of a plugin (no maintenance, no flight case).
Even beyond the introductory price, the full price of €199.99 seems reasonable value for money to me for the collection. I mean, I wouldn’t mind if they reduced the price to, say, around FREE, but that’s stretching wishful thinking.
Plugins come in 64-bit AU, VST2, VST3, and AAX formats for macOS and Windows.
More info: T-RackS TASCAM Tape Collection
The Giveaway
We are giving away a FREE copy of the T-RackS TASCAM Tape Collection to one lucky BPB reader (thanks, IK Multimedia! ❤️).
To enter the giveaway, answer this question in the comments section: Would you ever substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one?
We will pick the winners using a random comment picker on Monday, November 29th.
The winner is: Nicolas Fournier: n********@gmail.com
Congratulations! :)
Everyone else, thanks for participating, and better luck next time. Thanks for reading BPB! :)
More articles:
- Samplefino Analogue Drums Bundle Is FREE @ Bedroom Producers Blog
- BPB Saturator Is A FREE Tube/Tape Saturation VST Plugin
- Black Friday 2021 Deals (For Music Producers)
- All BlueLab Audio Plugins Are Now FREE!
T-RackS TASCAM Tape Collection Review
We loved how T-RackS TASCAM Tape Collection sounds, and we loved that the plugins aren't as obvious/intrusive as many other tape emulations.
689 Comments
Ivo Seifert
onNo, I would not
George B.
onNo, I don’t
Daniel Velehov
onNo. I’d not.
Brian
onAs tempting as it is, the space requirements, control, and ease of digital wins for me.
Rick
onFully analog? I don’t think so in this day and age. I think a hybrid setup is the way to go!
Matt Sullivan
onHonestly, a digital studio can be operated in a short amount of time through trial and error, tutorials, manuals and just plain dumb luck. The same cannot be said for an analog. Practice, training, money, calluses, blood, sweat, tears, years…The only way I would ever switch to analog is if i went back in time 20 years and started mastering the craft. Sadly, i just dont have the time for that anymore.
xero kar
onNo i don’t know how to use
Ceban
onNon, je le remplacerai pas du à l avance technologique de plugin et l’optimisation de l’espace
freesex
onDude, don’t get me wrong but why do you answer in French when the comment’s in English? 🤨🤨
Andre Summerville
onI would just for the crisp sound and to be back when times was good and you have to learn from the best to be the best.
Bruno Nascimento
onI definitely wouldn’t! Recall would be hell! 😱
Jarrett York
onNo, I would not. Simply due to lack of flexibility. However, I would love a dive into a hybrid set up.
AlexC
onNo I would not
Christopher Watson
onYes I do.
Surya Nugraha
onNo, it would be great, but analog is expensive :)
Jesse
onSim e não…
Sim pois analógico sempre vai ser analógico e o som é característico do equipamento…o timbre é o calor dele é é será único….
Não pelo custo e manutenção hoje de certos equipamentos e os plug-ins soam tão bem quanto ao analógico…
Peter Cliff Mugandani
onDefinitely not. I can carry my digital studio everywhere
Chris J Coyne
onNot any more. Hybrid at best, I’m afraid. I come from the large console / tape era (and even had a Portastudio). In the box for most things now, with just a bit of classic outboard on vocals or when tracking needs to breathe, or have some air. Tape maintenance was a pain (as were some consoles) and near zero latency tracking plus unlimited mixing paths these days mean if you can get 90% of the analog sound, especially in a dense mix, then that’s good enough for me!
Maldo
onI think hybrid sets are the best nowadays! Cheers
Jiri aka Rivermint
onYes, I would like really. Its because we lost so much using entirelly digital only for the sake of easy production. Take The Beatles for instance, that sound is pure magic.
RD
onI had a 3340 as my first tape machine and then Pete Townsend got involved in the band I was working with and leant me his Tascam 8 track on a number of occasions. When we started doing quite well as a band, we upgraded to a 16 track one inch Tascam and as the technology allowed ran a SMPTE from it to outboard drums machines, synths, sequencers etc. What I remember about that time was how to compete with the 2 inch Studers etc.in the big studios, as the smaller format tape machines never ever replayed a dynamic beat (such as an 808 bass drum) accurately. It just could not handle the punch. So we were itching for digital formats and never ever thought of the distortion factors of analogue, warmth etc because to get the punch and no tape hiss was the holy grail. How times change.
Tomislav Zlatic
onWelcome to BPB! And haha, I know what you mean. The grass is always greener on the other side!
West McGowan
onWould love to, just don’t have the money!
Marco B.
onToday is my lucky day, this is why Im going to win :-)
Flammodo
onNo, I would not
Christopher Watson
onYes I do.
xero kar
onNo ! i don’t know how to use
Fazil Irak
onNo I would not
daniel martinez gil
onen verdad creo que por siempre no lo cambiaria
Maurice Doucette
onNo, not worth the trouble.
John Irvine
onNo
Peter Teipe
onI did a lot on my cassette four track years ago, but at this point I probably wouldn’t trade my digital studio for analog
Med
onNo way. Workflow is so precious. All-analog would slow me down so much.
Vikramjit Banerjee
onNo i would not ever substitute my digital studio for an entirely analog one
Vik
Ciro Santana
onYes, I think I could.
Martin
onI guess i‘d always like to use a hybrid setup.
Martin
onI guess i‘d always like to use a hybrid setup. So no, id not
Richard Taylor
onI would! infant in 1991 I was already! with my trusty Tascam TSR8 half inch machine! now I’m using a MacBook and protools but still use my half inch TASCAM recorder to run my mixes thru as it generates a nice vibe. And clients think it looks cool too! ;-)
T R A E Z A R
onyeah i would ..id get shadow hills compressor an LA2A , DISTRESSOR…AN ANALOGUE SOUND IS SO UNIQUE. id also get a few Neuman 87s ,a large ssl mixing board with yamaha hs8 studio monitors …
Victor
onI would if I had the money!
Alby Arranz
onMy Answer is NO!
Gavish Patel
onNo I wont do that. I like to use both for production. I have a Yamaha Multi Track and love the Tape Sounds.
RAMON ARAUJO
onNão, eu não trocaria, mas gostaria de ter mais equipamentos analógicos. Trabalhar com um híbrido de digital e analógicos
Daryl Wright
onNo way!
Gustavo Garrido
onAbsolutely not! Today in Digital you can do incredible things and hardware will be less and less necessary. It is not the bow or the arrow, the important thing is who shoots.
Ahmet
onNo I would not
Enrique
onI wouldn’t. Too much time world be spent resetting and.normalizing things between projects, and I could probably only work with one client at a time. That’s a hard no for me.
Tansu
onI would love to have a fully analog studio, from the 80′ and 90′ era.
Rem
onYes. Only for analog recording sessions.
Aaron Jacobi
onI like the best of both worlds, I like digital and analogue, I utilise a 4 track cassette recorder and so.e rack mount stuff in my set up, I would never switch to full analogue though as modern day technology presents unlimited possibilities, combined with the limitations of analogue a hybrid digital analogue set up is the best way to go.
Guy
onNo, it’s a long time since I had to edit with a block and a razor blade.
stan goodspeed
onIf i only were mixing big band and jazz i might, but in order to be able to do any genre i would probably not
Michael Tra
onYes I would, I feel like I would be more creative
Lotuz
onNo, I want the best of both worlds.
Jay Northall
onI would like to say yes but I like both analogue and digital equally as they both have pros and cons…so no for now.
Tiago
onHonestly i am split in etween. Analog gear has an clear in the sound department but i think the digital realm is way too convienient.
Good review!
Tone
onI wouldn’t, there are too many advantages in digital audio.
Andy
onalready yes, thanks bpb
Kamil
onHIBRID
HSN
onI am fully digital and do not look back. I still remember dealing with cables distorting signal. If I want analog feel, especially tape machine there are plugins for it without need to waste time with setting tape machine head and EQ.
Wolfy
onYes, anytime!
Priyanshu Kainthola
onMaybe, who Knows
if I like the Analog Sound and will have money to purchase it.
Corti.Son
onHi, I’d love to have a completely analog studio and the bucks to keep it running, but I’d probably miss a lot of things too.
J
onNever, unless that full analog studio comes with two assistants doing all the tedious work for me.
Alexain
onNo, never. I think it’s way better digital now.
Max Gavrilov
onNo, digital world is here. And of course it’s much easier to work with digital resources!
Jack G
onI would say yes. I would have to find all my virtual gear in reality but I think there’s definitely a charm to it and a certain benefit of not having constant distraction or visualization. Though for some tasks I would miss the digital world (but not that much). So yes would be my answer :)
SimonP
onI think in our times it is not possible, if there was the possibility I would like to try it the full 100% analog :)
Chris
onThat’s a tough question to answer. If you’d asked that question 15 years ago, I without a doubt would say, “Give me the analog studio.” Today, it’s not that easy. Plugin emulations and as well as creative digital plugins have come a long way. So the question for me is, dealing with analog limitations and mix recall, is it worth having an all analog studio? I’d have to say it’s not worth the headache that comes with an all analog studio. It’s more than just the limitations and mix recall to consider. You have to maintain all of the analog gear. Everyone knows gear breaks down and always needs repair of some type. And it always happens at the worst time. So, to wrap up my answer, I’ll stick with digital.
p.s. Hybrid setup is idea.
Chris
onSorry for the grammar mistakes. I was in a hurry.
Nicolas Hourquet
onWhaou, hardware mais pourquoi, ik est dans ma boite a outils et j espere bientôt que teac aussi. Fan fan fan.
George ware
onYes, I don’t have any of the vintage gear so this would be a good start
George ware
Axel Ferrari
onNOT TODAY! In the box I can work on multiple project at the same time. Analog gear is not ok for today production rythm (and maybe this is the reason why we have a lot of bad music! :S)
marti garaughty
onWith extensive experience in both analog & digital recording, NO I could never go back. It would be like giving up my car for a horse & buggy ! ;-)
Roman
onExactly, lol.
Tim
onNo, the complement each other!
Roman
on«Would you ever substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one?»
No way! All in the box, baby!
Gery Zenz
onbeautiful emulation!
Tim
onWould you ever substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one?
Yes, I would! If I got some analog vintage EQ’s/Compressor’s/Limiter’s, I could just rebuy the digital Stuff I really need. ;)
Patrick
onNot a chance!
The great thing about tools like these is being able to get very close to the sonic benefits of working with analog gear without the hassle of working with analog hardware.
Sergey
onNope, nope, nope %)
A3C
onNO WAY. I wish I could see everyone here who said “yes” trying to copy Chorus 1 on Chorus 2 using a 24 tracks ATR.
Tristan G.
onI probably won’t because of the place needed for analog pieces.
André Langenfeld
onif the required space comes with it, of course!
Pablin Drummer
onYes…..and No!
Najib Husein
onNo
Keegan
onIf I had all the money I needed? I would take an all-analog setup in a heartbeat, sheeeeeeeeeeesh
Bart
onNot, i love digital studio with analog simulations. :)
Joao Bispo
onI wouldn’t replace my digital studio for an analog one, for convenience, the planet and flexibility on the move.
Stefan
onI am more flexible with my digital gear and therfore my answer is no!
Stevie Mac
onNo chance, there is a place for analog gear and I have a few pieces, but the convenience and versatility of digital gear and software far outstrips the any benefit being ‘all analog’ would bring, especially for mere bedroom producers like ourselves!
emmanuel hubaut
onNo, Mix of Analog and digital is the best !
Enzo
onNon avendo un hardware analogico, non posso fare la differenza,
Petr Piskunov
onI have no time for analog mix. No.
malik amer
onyeah for sure if I got a great analog one but that will never happen hahahaha
Sean Mulhern
onIf I had the space I would.
Matt St-L
onI would not, sadly because we’re in a time where digital is as good as what analog was king back in the days. Save so much space that we can emulate a huge studio right from our home!
Rustam
onPerhaps, but first I would try.
Laura
onWhy go back to fully analog when there is the Tascam Tape Collection to get that analog sound? Working in a DAW is so much faster and convenient.
Ralf
onNo, nerver. Niemals nicht, nein!
Greyvin
onNo, I definitely wouldn’t
Alex
onMostly not. Maybe some units
Nico de Haan
onI prefer a combi
Leonid Velichkovski
onNo!
Brodie Conley
onYou’d have to be nuts to do that! No way would I substitute that.
Jed
onI think you picked the wrong question to ask. Most of us have studied and get used to DIGITAL environment lol….Whatever you make on an analog, live or even psychoacoustic device, it will end up DIGITAL : 44100 – 96000hz 16/24/32 bit…..come to terms with it already.
Jorjhan Castro
onNot really, I would use them both, taking advantage of the two worlds
Henrique Carvalhal
onNot entirely, I would always prefer having an hybrid between digital and analog.
Alex Swanson
onYes. because its the natural course of progress of the music industry!
L Baldwin
onI would not go full analog! I like working hybrid and digital offers so much more speed and efficiency that
is very hard to match when rewinding and loading tape. I’ve worked in both and I’m pretty happy on the computer at the moment.
Wilson Sierra
onIf I would have a complete human equipment that bring me his help working with the analog devices, I would change digital for analog, i would have TASCAM Tape collection!!!
djsegwon kithebeats
onIf I had the space, YES!
Norman Lariviere
onNo, a hybrid setup with an automated analog console and amazing converters is what I would prefer.
Mark P
onYes, I would! Only to get the feel of Analog Hardware. I have never used those and have only heard of it.
ZAIZAR ESTUDIOS
onSi lo haría, aunque hay demasiadas ventajas en el audio digital, por eso estas hermosas emulaciones de sonidos análogos que llegan a nuestro estudio
Andrew
onNever!
Michal
onDefinitely not. I am fan of some analog equipment but complete analog world take too much time and money. I think some emulations are very good and can give you great results too.
hai
onno, I’m too much of a zoomer
Dominik
onNo, i want!
Jim Baker
onNo too many benefits with digital
imstre jonas
onNo. I think it’s way better digital now.
Jessica
onI would prefer the Digital variant over the analog one. Digital version is more convenient for me.
Alain
onI would never go back to fully analog, the DAW let’s you work from anywhere, besides equipment can get super expensive and it won’t last forever, but I would love to have some analog equipment for my studio and do a hybrid settup, plugins still can’t 100% emulate the analog ¨textures¨ and ¨warmness¨.
Mickaël Duvallet
onNo. Unless i become the boss of a real studio..
Ruben Granado
onSi, espero que algun día pueda hacero.
Carlos
onIf I had the money yes… I love analog stuff… but to be honest, software designers are doing spectacular jobs! It make us re-think if analog its fully necessary when you have not too much money.
lesego sehume
onIn the digital age with available emulations like Tascam Tape Collection I will not move to analogue gear.
Project
onNo, for practical reasons I can only consider a hybrid or digital only setup
Jim Baker
onNo too many benefits with digital, hybrid the way to go for me
Nick
onNo. Can’t beat the convenience of digital.
Santiago Barceló
onHi !. No, I wouldn’t use only analog devices, but they are great ! Thanks for this article.
Rich Cooke
onno I would not. People use what technology is available at the time, the notion that analog is better is ridiculous. The pioneers of analog would possibly be using digital if it were available.
ambedo
onIf i worked more in the traditional band sector (rock, country, jazz, vocal recording ext) i would absolutely take a fully analog studio. But for the genres im into – digital/hybrid setup is the only way to go.
Sheldon Young
onYes, if that’s all I had
Ivan Grigorov
onI would love to have a fully analog studio, but i’ll use both.
Andrey Surin
onNever! But it could be for a short time, for analog recording sessions. But then again, I would go back to digital audio and plugins.
Sultan
onNope
Johannes
onNo, never ever. I had to record on tape and editing tape is a slow, never-ending pain of jog&shuttle.
CKJ
onnono
Lars Morten Lindberg
onNope!
Cédric
onI would
Tony
onBoth have their place, but you can’t swap all the way!
Satyabrata Choudhury
onNo, no way.
HITESH BANDHU
onfor me i can’t sacrifice one for the other. I need both
Khael Thai
onEsto es genial sin duda, gracias por todo BPB.
Spit
onOui pourquoi pas si mes moyens me le permettent, mais j’aime les deux mondes !
Jordi
onhell no
But i would go hybrid for sure
Frank Ndlovu
onNever in a million years I like having the best of both worlds
Lipton Pattnayak
onSurely would love to, If I can get a boatload of money from somewhere.
Alper
onNo, i want
David Borg
onI would only convert to an all analog setup if I got to work with Jack White at one of his studios lol. Or else it’s not worth it
Baptiste Brasseur
onOf course, just for the fact of not being enslaved by a computer…
javier cruz
onNot a fully analog studio, but a hybrid digital analog studio is the best option today.
Pedro Valério
onI would think about it but I would like to have both
Ryan H
onNope, would not replace digital workstation though I’m a fan of tape
Willem Moller
onNo I wouldn’t, but I do use a lot of analog gear – console, preamps, compressors – when tracking.
Mark C
onNo-I don’t have the space!
James Reynolds
onYes but safe in the knowledge I’d ultimately be able to have both.
Patrik Roncolato
onnot at all ;)
Diogo Soares
onNo, entirely no, but a part of it, yeah!
Larry Larraga
onI would NEVER substitute my digital studio for an entirely analog one!
Gotno
onSure why not right? It’d be fun to flail around in a completely different way than usual! :)
Rikk Show
onNo. Digital in the box has so many advantages. But from a workflow perspective who doesn’t love knobs and tweaking? That is pure inspiration and very useful to keep it fun and be creative. Hard to beat my original ms-20 when it comes to that. Nice to see you get so much engagement nowadays by the way.
Nicholas
onYup, in a heartbeat…. grew up analog, love the sound, nothing like it.
Luke Franks
onNo. Definitely not.
Eugeniu Costin
onWith all due respect to analog hardware, I would never change. Then now with such precise emulation and with all the ease of routing on a pc it is much easier, even to open a project from two years ago. I would opt for digital.
Richard Surratt
onNEVAH
Pablo
onYes. More tactile. A different feel.
Kyle
onNo. I had a fully analog studio once upon a time. While I miss some of the simplicity, the digital domain has provided so much more flexibility. I had a Tascam Portastudio similar to the one this plugin emulates. It would be cool to use that and hear if it sounds familiar.
DHM
onNo.
Angelo Colasanti
onI’d rather build a logical mix between the digital and analog studios. With an totally analog set there a level of attention when recording, to avoid editing, such feeling doesn’t exist on the digital world, you can record an entire song by gluying small phrases/loops.. I don’t know. Cheers!
Dimitar Yosifov
onno,i don,t
Marcio Fernandes
onNo way! Digital all the way! 🤩
Fabricio Viscardi
onNope. That would be crazy.
Tefes
onAs sick as I am of computer hardware repeatedly failing on me, no I wouldn’t. A digital studio is just too flexible.
Sebastian
onno, prefiero hibrido
Haroun
onI Totally Would, then after the said substitution, I would re-digitalize it progressively by Only Adding what I need in a given situation
Fabricio Viscardi
onNope. That would be crazy. Totally crazy.
Daniel S
onNo I wouldn’t swap my digital studio for an all analogue one, I don’t have the space or the money and would also miss the easy editing that digital allows.
Michael Filser
onOnly if I had the space and of course the money:-)
Ray Andrade
onNo. I would not.
Silas Garrett
onIf I somehow got an analog studio for free, I would totally try to use it on its own, but it’s not something I would seek out.
ALBiON
onNo. Digital has too much going for it on so many levels.
Pablo Baico
onReally… mix of analog and digital is the best option for me.
Thanks and good luck for everybody.
Vassils Pantazopoulos
onNo,i would not.
LUCIANO
onNão trocaria, mas um Modelo Híbrido seria bastante interessante
Michael Svedberg
onI think I more or less already have a digital studio, but I would sure love to swap out a couple of items for analogue gear instead. Nothing beats the memories of using the old Tascam 244 deck when recording ;)
Vitaly Smotrov
onyes!
Amey Jichkar
onI Definitely wouldn’t switch to complete analog. Unless we are living in a post apocalyptic scenario where there are no computers or the internet.
Francois M
onNo , thanks, maybe in another life
Amey Jichkar
onI wouldn’t switch to a completely analog system, unless we are living in a post apocalyptic scenario where there are no computers or the internet.
Brian
onNo I like to blend both analog & digital, finding the best of both worlds.
Alexey
onEntirely? No.
manni
onRecallabilty-argument is too strong
greetings 2 all
Mark
onNo. Staying digital!
Mike
onNo, I have my process, which is 90% in the box.
Stanislav
onI have never done this, but I would love to have such an experience.
Vitor Melo
onNot just because it doesn’t have an appropriate structure for it
Serg
onI would if I can build it collecting freebies here.
Uriel Soto, Jr.
onI WOULD NOT COMPLETELY SWITCH FROM DIGITAL TO ANALOG. A HYBRID OR COMBINATION OF BOTH IS GOOD BUT NOT COMPLETELY ANALOG.
Yi-Wen
onProbably not… depending on what caliber of analog gear we’re talking about!
Allen Somerlot
onI don’t believe it would be nearly as practical to REPLACE my digital capabilities. I WOULD welcome the addition of analog goodness in any case ;)
Lex
onYo creo que es mejor tener a ambos mundos conviviendo.
Así tenemos ambas ventajas sobre todo por la historia y lo bien que suenan.
Vassilis Pantazopoulos
onNo,i would not
Matt Hooper
onYes, but the id sell it and go digital again.
Ragnar
onNo. Don’t want to miss Melodyne for example.
Angelo Furlan
onI’d go all analog if if I had the room AND if I could also lose about 20 years off my age. If I have to go back in time, let me go all the way.
Javi Robles
onMaybe, if I have enough money and space to have an analog studio xD.
Julius
onNo.
William Lopes
onI would say no because the music industry has evolved a lot, especially when it comes to the digital age.
Deighton Warner
onNo. I would not! I actually still own the A-3340S and had the A-3440 and back in time, the options then between tape, using bias and speed were tremendous factors in quality. I had many a recording using the same Sony stereo mic come out completely different with some very WARM better than cassette and some with unbelievable Hiss! I just use it for running my master bus through sometimes but not always because the plugins are so predictable now.
I think the video review is excellent because I remember some decisions I made were budget related to tape costs.
Aris
onNo
Ivan
onI would like to combine both options. I think it would be more rational.
Mika
onYes…..of course.
Alexandr Vasiltsov
onToday I don’t want to deal with analog equipment. I manage with digital emulation of these devices and everything suits me perfectly.
Rainer Spechtl
onNo, never!
nick vlassis
onABSOLUTELY WOULD !! The sound I can get out of analog is a nice change from our advanced digital world of music we live in now !
Ryan
onNo, I wouldn’t want a purely analog studio. I prefer to use a DAW and plugins for most things along with some hardware (digital and analog) that I can’t replicate in a DAW or that I enjoy using more than plugin equivalents.
alp
onI can’t say anything positive but I think a hybrid studio would be nice as I have used some analog equipment in the past.
Gabriel
onI choose to stay Hybrid, picking the best of both worlds!
o t
onNot sure
Eldad
onYes I would :)
Jose Mari Ibanez
onI actually wouldn’t *fully* go analog. I’d rather go hybrid, but mostly digital. While having some hardware is nice, it wouldn’t really be helpful for electronic genres. Most hardware nowadays simply cannot achieve what digital plugins can do. But still, when recording, it would be nice to get that analog warmth and magic.
Mike
onNo, hybrid is the way !
Thomas
onI will not dare to completely switch to analogue. However, I really like to use analog devices in combination with digital capabilities.
Psolkaiyn
onMm, for the question. Even if they did it for free and managed to reproduce every strange and wholly digital effect and synth in my collection in analog form and it was guaranteed that I would legitimately have the space for all of that gear… the answer is still a resounding NO. The convenience of having all of these synths and effects easily accessible in one small but powerful and versatile box is simply too great to give up. That being said, I do see the value in having a few choice pieces of analog gear around that I would use regularly.
gabriel garcia
onHoy dia segun mi punto de vista prefiero lo digital,por su versatilidad.Gracias
Evgeniy
onNo!
Uchindami
onI definitely would do that if money grew on trees
Uchindami
onHowever, I would look for analog hardware which produce less noise than the vintage ones
Juan21pedraza
onOf course not because both have pros and cons and It is better to work with both.
Michael N
onNo, pure analog would be far too restrictive and cumbersome for me.
Hector Baldiviezo
onDepende las circunstancias.
Jimmy De Keersmaeker
onNo, but it would be nice to have some analog gear next to the computer. It really could be a source of inspiration and give some magic touch.
Rodson Martins
onNão, eu não trocaria meu estúdio digital por um estúdio totalmente analógico, mas consideraria fazer uso hibrido: digital e analógico.
Célio Marin
onCom certeza sim, caso houvesse essa possibilidade!
Thomas Brunhøj
onNo i would not. I want the benefit of hybrid setup.
Jomani Moore
onNo – Too time consuming – Digital comes close enough that the time that is saved makes it worth it
PureFire
onThank you for the opportunity James, BPB & IK Multimedia & Happy 50th Anniversary to TASCAM.
A great review James, thats a really interesting read & very helpful as well, thank you.
A tape machine must be one of the hardest things to covert into an audio plug-in with all things considered. at least theres no need to buy any tape for it tho haha.
Q: Would you ever substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one?
A: yes, i have never had fully analog studio & if i didn’t like it, i’d swap back lol
thanks again 😊❤️
Javier Alzate
onWould you ever substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one?
digital equipment for me is fine. I like them. but I really like being in the middle of the two universes of musical production
Carl
onWould you ever substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one?
No.
Jet
onNo, digital is easy to manage.
Lesha
onNo, I would not.
manni
onmh, this question must be a trap xD
Carlos Flores
onjust some of them. May be for nostalgy.
jay
onNo way!
Max
onСкорее всего нет. Но рассмотрел бы как дополнение!
Adrian Gottstein
onWell I really dig an analog workflow, but since I like recording and editing digitally I would always go the hybrid way. So to answer in short : Nope I wouldn’t.
Bryan Peppin
onNo.. I’m In The Box.. and don’t see that happening!!
Anton Popov
onNo, I don’t
Attaman
onWith all the tecnology of today and industries like T-racks that invest on it, we don’t need those analog gear so much as it was on the past, so i would keep my digital studio!!!
Glauco W. Beall
onThere’s no analog equipment for free,so…
Oliver
onNo way! Wait, do I get to sell some of that analog gear, and get me some more digital? 😄
Ioannis Mermigkas
onWith today’s technology I would not.
Peter Bojesen
onNo. Digital is limitless
Dino Cikaric
onI would because digital software does not have any value after you buy it, though it is much easier to carry around with you 😂 Analog does take more work when things need fixing but the sound difference is unmatchable compared to most plugins. We are seeing some vst’s come close to originals but there still needs to be work done.
In my opinion Analog is a hands on experience that cannot be replicated by digital.
Olaf
onTricky question. I’ve thought about that myself.
Being an analog recording studio engineer was an adventure – both for good and for bad. Finishing a record was an accomplishment in itself, not in how it did on the market, and it involved hands on, perpetual creative problem solving, ingenuity, technical knowledge, not just musical, and a lot of energy. I feel that sense of adventure is lost now. You had to be a lot more decisive – again, for better and for worst – and know what you’re doing a lot more, because there was no going back on anything – or it wasn’t easy. DAWs have brought a very interesting paradox – you mix first and record later – you can mix your demo takes and record the “flawless” takes – let’s call them that – after, as long as you keep the source signal chain unchanged – minimalistic, at that – gain on your interface, the same instrument, etc.
That’s why the whole profession was a lot more prestigious. Add to that the music was a lot better, and mixing, in itself, was a lot more artistic than it is today, for all the talk about “character”, “tone”, bla-bla, most people today apply technical processing, and not artistic processing, which makes mixing a lost art – or maybe there’s just so many dilettantes in it, with all the accessibility, which makes it seem that way.
The answer to the question, to me, comes down to sound. I’ve recently realized from all the thousands of records that I’ve listened to, 95% of which being from the era of analog, or recorded like that, I can name maybe a handful that are technically flawless (weird thing is it’s still a minority of technically flawless records today, when there’s no technical or resource related reason for it). Most of them suffered from mud, problematic EQ-ing, things getting lost, oversaturation, so on, so forth. But they’re ALL sonically beautiful. Amazingly enough. All of them. That’s what it’s about. Sonic beauty – the beauty of sound, the beauty of tone. Not just putting sound together, but bringing out the beauty in every single one. And that’s an art that is completely lost today. For all the fetisihizing of tone, that word has completely lost meaning, and most records today, even those that are well balanced, punchy, well mixed, are UGLY sounding. I feel people have forgotten why they mix – they’ve replaced all kinds of dry, abstract technical and intellectual considerations – stock wider, stock punchier, etc. – for all feeling, assessment and understanding of sound, the emotional quality of pieces, and the contribution each sound needs to have in the wider picture. They talk about “character” but what they mean is usually aggressive mangling and lo-fi-ing, which, paradoxically, was never a goal in the analog era, quite the contrary.
The thing is, if you wake me up and ask what I’m a fan of, analog or digital, I’ll answer without even taking a breath `analog` – all the way, there’s not even a doubt in my mind. But I’ve never worked on a large format mixing console, with the entire analog signal chain – tape machines, racks – in my life. Ever. I’m aware of the irony. I’ve experimented with stuff, I know what it does, but had it not been for DAWs and plugins, I would not be making music. Period.
And there’s also the convenience. An analog studio is an operation. You can’t do it by yourself. Think only about the cleaning and maintenance – repairs, etc.
Once sound is taken care of, it’s also a matter of convenience and accessibility – both physical and financial. If no “analog” plugins existed, given the option, I’d prefer the fully analog studio. I’d curse my days sometimes, because of administrative stuff, all the unglamorous hassle that doesn’t get mentioned, I’d accept the limitations, I’d take the definitive character of any recording, I’d go with the complication of getting some operations done. There simply is no replacement for the sound.
But if I can get the sound completely in the box, with all the options, and with the added convenience, accessibility, and extra possibilities, I’d stick to the DAW. Once the sound is achieved, there’s no beating the convenience and the possibilities – not to mention the budgets.
Add a good mixing console replacement controller – that’s still a challenge to implement, for some impossible to understand reason – and you have that solved, too. Working with a mouse vs. an ergonomically designed console is a complete joke. That will be my next step, to put it in a lot of hours and try to solve, when I get the time, hopefully soon. For some reason, the recording device industry doesn’t yet feel a dedicated, accessible, mixing controller to replace a console isn’t a necessity, and it can be replaced with make shift devices – like a mouse. DAWs need to have a dedicated mixer, with all the tools, not just Pro Tools effects boxes – some already do, like Cakewalk, Reason and Harrison, and a full mixing controller needs to be a tool in itself, that you buy just like you buy the software, completely integrated to operate the mixer, just like a console. It can be a small format 8 track that allows you to quickly flip through buckets maybe with modular buckets that can be coupled to extend the main unit – something like that.
Sound wise, for now, amps seem to be hard to simulate well, mostly the fizz, the mud, the inertial low end, and the flatness, that you just don’t get with good miking on the real thing – depending mostly on the cab simulation options. But overall, I feel the sound of the analog world in the box problem is close to being solved. There is stuff out there – plugins – that sounds exceptionally well, and overall the industry of plugins still hasn’t gotten to perfectly replicating the vibe of analog and sweetening the sound as well, but it’s very close. Very, very close, for the best of them.
I just hope the last inches of this gap will be bridged – it would be the biggest shame in the recording industry’s existence if that sound was lost with the dusk of the analog age – along with controller integration, and you’ve got the best of both worlds in the DAW.
So with that condition, of sound, which is not negotiable, DAWs for me, which is almost a personal disappointment, because I adore the romantism of that era – even hyped as it is, there really was genuine romance and adventure in it, which will be forever lost.
Great question.
Andrew Shchannikov
onNo way.
Samir
onNo, I don’t
Chris
onNo I wouldn’t. I lived through the analogue scene once, already!
Ron Music
onit depends on the goal 😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃
Lykouras Athanasios
onNot in any case ..
@dafingaz
onNo. I like to created while on the go (vacations, traveling, out with the family).
That would be really hard in an all analog world. 😳🤣
Deggsy
onIt’s a no from me .
Giuseppe
onNo, thanks!
Claudio Marcozzi
onDefinitely no!
Eric
onI would…… over my dead body!
Samuel NICOLAY
onYes, already done.
David
onNO
Mai
Jacky
onNo, I wouldn’t go analog. I’m happy working digitally and it takes up a lot less space :)
Robin
onNo.
Jacky
onNo, I wouldn’t go fully analog. I’m happy working digitally and it takes up a lot less space :)
AT
onNope.
Arshan
onYou should check out the tape collection in my stationary drawer :D
JT Harris
onI don’t think I’d replace one for the other, but I’d sure like to attend the week long Analogue Boot Camp, and see and hear what happens. I do value IK’s products and use many of them frequently.
Thank BPB!
Bogdan Bogdanov
onNo!
Luiz
onMaybe half of them :)
Alfonso Diaz
onNo, thanks. I want to have my cake and eat it too! Best of both worlds!
BoogieNaught
onNo,way !
I’ll mix and make music in the box
And think outside the box ;-)
Sascha
onno, never these days.
I have participated and used the technical development. 4+8 track cassette recorder, tape machine, HD+MD recorder and then computer based recording.
Not everything is 100% great in the digital age, but I wouldn’t want to miss or trade the possibilities of today.
Javier
onNot really
I believe in a few more years the analog will be a complement to the digital one. Digital is getting closer and closer in quality and allows a more exact way of working if needed.
Pablo Altés
onWhy would I when you niw can have best of both worlds ?
Philip Arickx
onNo, probably not.
Terra_H
onNever. <3.
Not Bill
onIf I was Bill Gates. Sure, why not.
Isaías Muñoz
onNo, la verdad no… Mas bien sería una combinación entre lo análogo y lo digital!!
Nick Brand
onNo, digital is the future. flexible and more possibilities.
Nicolás Zeballos
oni would not change, digital studio has more options to offer than analog studio.
Simon Oxblod
onI would. If I could afford it. I would love to work old school with tapes and spring reverbs and such. But it’s but a dream.
hammerpocket
onIf I could have the hardware equivalent of all the plugins I have (an SSL desk, LA2As, 1176s, Fairchild 670, grand piano, Mellotron, Hammond B3, Wurlitzer 200A, a collection of classic synths, practically every guitar amp known to man, bass guitars, drums, orchestral instruments of all types, great recording rooms, plate reverb, etc., etc., etc.), then.. well, no, I still don’t think I would give up digital recording!
Patrick Osterday
onNo. Cool idea, but need to be mobile too much these days and rely on my laptop!
Nikola
onWell,no.I think its best to go with the time and go digital.
Andreas Gassber
onNo, to much stuff to maintain.
Demetrios
onYes, and here is why. If I lose access to the Internet or cannot use it in certain spaces, I cannot use or download a lot of digital functions.
Each layer of dependence you add to the process jeopardizes your ability to be creative in the future. One should have no anxieties when they create.
Cam
onI wouldn’t substitute digital for analog, only because digital is more efficient, even though analog has the character & tone that I want. My dream is to have a hybrid of the two
Alexandr Solovyov
onNo, but it’s interesting to try
Chris Thomas
onReplace? No chance. That said, I am shopping for an old tape machine to supplement my setup :) These plugins would make for a fun comparison.
Jawnson
onNo. However having a hybrid workflow would be something i’d rather go for
Dave Younger
onNo I wouldn’t. I had enough of that “back in the day” :)
Mike Herrera
onNo, definitivamente no sería posible, sería un sueño claro, pero no creo que sea posible, crecí completamente en el mundo Digital, no podría entrar a un mundo Analógico, quizá podría tener algunos equipos que brinde ese sonido pero enteramente dejar lo digital, creo sería imposible y poco sustentable.
Shane
onMmmmmm. honestly i wouldnt.
The things were able to do now itb i couldnt let that go to go full analog.
Sidder Spinsel
onno. i love analog, but digital is to comfotable (and less expensive).
Dino
onNo I would never haha not entirely, that’s a step backwards!
Augustto Queiroz
onNo.
Belman
onMuy difícil, ya que el proceso de audio digital cada vez va tomando mayor fuerza y hay muchas mejoras 👌 Aunque es difícil sustituir un equipo analógico, hay varios plugins hoy en día que hacen muy buenas emulaciones ¡¡
Mientras tanto seguiremos trabajado el Audio Digital ¡¡
Pdta. Buena reseña de las Cintas ¡¡ 👌
Bajista Mendoza
onCreo que es muy difícil ¡¡
Hoy en día se pueden hacer muchas cosas similare con Software y Plugins Digital mente ¡¡
Dimaslavsky
onIf there was such a person who would agree to sponsor me, throw money into my orchestra and buy me analog equipment instead of my plug-ins, I would definitely not refuse.
and then I would have safely sold all this and flew to the Mekong Delta, because I had never been there.
Viktor
onyou need to take the best of both worlds ) so, supplement – yes, completely replace – no
Nicolas Hourquet
onMais non de non, gain de place, de temp et permet d expérimenté, plus de chose, ik best.
Niall Byrne
onNo. Digital offers too many possibilities to take it totally out of the mix.
Michael
onNot entirely, no.
But I’m working ITB plus a small amount of analog hardware and consumer tapedecks, which are an amazing addition to the whole sound.
Scott
onIf I can a fully analog studio with everything that I wanted (so we are talking an LA recording studio plus) it would be hard to say no. But digital includes a DAW and there is NO way I would splice tape! : )
Antonio Iunco
onYES! And then I’d sell most part of the analog gear in and reinvest it in acoustics, networking, plugins, marketing and, of course, education!
konstantinos
onsuper tape vintage…!!!
Kami H
onNo way !
Leslie
onYes!! I would love having analog gear. Obviously will never be able to afford. But yeah.
Rodney Lee
onNo I would not!
SFM
onYeah if i had enough money. I’d do in a heartbeat
Mario
onNo Way José!
Вадим
onNot a chance!
Daedalus Wyss
onYes. If I could I would do that.
I might regret it later, but I’d definitely try it.
Osvaldo Morejon
onI would not do that. It is just a better workflow for these days having the flexibility and be able to work in any place just usin your basic gear.
jo
onyes, because why not?
Javier Arteaga
onIf I could afford it…may be
Peter Herczeg
onexcluded
Adam Rogers
onNo. I think digital provides so much flexibility and simplicity (a at least in terms of wiring, connections, power use, heat etc.) A partially malady studio would be nice, but not solely.
Norman Stewart
onI would not change. Too much versatility with plugins. I can put a different version of a Fairchild compressor on 50 different tracks if I want!
mx
oni would not substitute software completely, because it is just too handy compared to working analog all the way.
but the pleasure of turning real potis, also two at a time, will always make me do certain things with hardware, though it doesnt have to be analog inside.
Mr Olu
onNo, not completely, but mostly…about 70% analog and 30% digital. However, I would definitely insist on all vintage analog consoles. I still can’t get over the drastic difference in sound and character between analog boards and digital ones.Would definitely want real Leslie speakers and old school reverb units
Al F
onAnalog sound is now at our reach with all the incredible plugins we have. The digital workflow is so much better that I couldn’t think about changing how I work right now.
Alex Vitkovsky
onNo, I wouldn’t. My digital studio suits me!
Rave Sbor
onProbably not
Ori
onIf I had the space I think I would.
Always loved to the analog feeling :)
Arath Adriel
onI think if I had the opportunity and the economy acceptable, I would. I think that despite being used to working in digital, I believe that it is never too late to learn new things, especially as producers, that we are constantly learning and adapting in the musical environment.
MIKAEL BIRRAUX
onNO
Ronald Irawan
onYes, if SSL/API Desk for Analog Summing.
Irion Da Ronin
onI wouldn’t change my way to make music or workflow, that would mean more time invested, and i want focus my time in making music, not learning new stuff, or even buying stuff.
Have a nice day and good luck everyone! :)
Leo
onBoth digital and analog have their own merits. I want to use it on a case-by-case basis. So sometimes it’s completely analog, sometimes it’s completely digital, and sometimes it’s a mix of both. But with the amazing T-RackS TASCAM Tape Collection, it may be possible to move completely to digital. Give me a present to verify that!!
Juanca Estremadoyro
onAnalógico totalmente no! un sistema híbrido considero que es mucho más versátil y flexible
RedBaron
onHybrid is a desirable option for two worlds meeting. A complete Analogue set up would bring the comforting heat and energy from the components. Not forgetting the distinct smell of valves and transformers cooking before air con was prevalent.
Nicolas Fournier
onNot a chance!
Tomislav Zlatic
onYou won the giveaway. Congratulations! :) Please check your inbox.
Luis Mario Magaña
onYes!! i love analog hardware, i recorded many music on Tascam analog and digital machines, i have a Tascam M-160 on my studio and cassette recorders, tape machines. Yes!
Patrick
onNo, I would not
Marcelo Ribeiro Simões
onAt the first time, no, I would not.
But it depends on what analog items I could have.
Studer(s), SSL(s), etc. could make me tempted… ;-)
the intern
onYes, absolutely!
Stefano Papetti
onIt wouldn’t make any sense to discard all the convenience and advantages of digital audio. Still, a lot of nice hardware is also becoming affordable, and it’s great that I could add a few devices to my setup lately, especially synths and drum machines. I still feel the connection with a hardware unit cannot be overcome by software.
LEONOR GELEN RAYMUNDO ACUÑA
onI would like to compare digital sound with analog sound.
Stefano
onIt wouldn’t make any sense to discard all the convenience and advantages of digital audio. Still, a lot of nice hardware is also becoming affordable, and it’s great that I could add a few devices to my setup lately, especially synths and drum machines. I still feel the connection with a hardware unit cannot be overcome by software.
juan motta
onNoooooo!!!!
Falko Freund
onNo 🤣😀😅
Davor Brijačak
onNo, never!
ELZURIX
onNo, maintaining it will probably be a nightmare
Max Trone
onI would if I could get over my fear of using an analog sequencer!
Jay Kekkonen
onNah too expensive and digital workflow is much better. Best of both worlds tho.
Michael
onNo, I’m thinking about adding something of the analog world, but to ban using ITB stuff in 21 century is crazy!
Jonathan Paris
onI would provided i had an assistant to do all my session recalls :P
Michael
onMaybe… I mean, I don’t have enough space here for a full analog studio, but if it would come with a house built around it, I would take it.
Adnan
onNo, not completely at least.
Chris Krupa
onIt’s a nice thought, but no, been there in the nineties and it was too damn hard :)
Pedro Ronquillo
onLa verdad seria muy bueno equipo analógico porque nada es mejor que lo original, en este caso los equipos, pero creo que al usar complementos digitales tienes mas facilidades por ejemplo tener el mismo complemento en cada canal que en analógico no se puede y además de la movilidad que tienes al usar complementos digitales que te permite trabajar de varios lugares muy fácil y con muy buena calidad, así que me quedo con complementos digitales.
GILVAN RIBEIRO COSTA
onI wouldn’t change it, because I wouldn’t be able to pay for all the maintenance expenses, even more than the customers are not paying for us to keep everything analog. I would even work with something else 80% of the digital suits me.
Music ByIan
onNo. I’m old enough to remember when the hiss, warble and analogue goodness was unwanted. Nevermind the worn tape heads, and chewed up tapes.
Chris Share
onNo.
Radosław Osypiuk
onYes I do. It’s because when I use DAW and plugins I very often mix with my eyes unfortunately… And I think it isn’t a good habit.
Christian Bock
onNo, I would not. :-)
Suny Chapon
onNo, I wouldn’t. I’d rather have a hybrid solution.
Abner Khuzwayo
onNo chance I would😂
Mauricio Mallmann
onNo. :)
gabriel salgado
onsi, la experiencia palpable siempre es mejor, igual el ultimo eslabon de la cadena, hoy, siempre es digital.
Giordano Conti
onNot completely, but … why not? if it sounds good….I would definitely integrate analog to digital
Bogdan Sinchenko
onI would not completely replace it, but I also wanted to have analog devices.
Wesley gardner
onNo to much work. But I think the people that are doing a remote studio were you can control the equipment from anywhere while sending audio in is outstanding!
Thomas
onOnly if it fit in my rucksack
bart walravens
onOnly if the A studio came with a technician to keep everything in working order…..oh, ànd a coffee maker! Can’t do analogue without coffee!
Ben
onI don’t think I would go completely analog. I prefer the workflow of ITB mixing and there are a few AI-assisted plugins I would like to keep using. I’d definitely like to add some analog preamps and distortion tools though
andrea
onNo, I wouldn’t. First of all, I used to own an all-analog studio back in the 1990s, and although I loved it, I remember very well all the obstacles and limitations I had to cope with. First, in order to operate analog gear, you need money and plenty of time to maintain it properly. You never know what and when is going to break down and whether you will be able to fix it on your own. Besides, even if we like the “analog sound” and try to add a little bit of noise to the sterile digital sound, we have to keep in mind that noise was a real curse of the analog domain and we used to dream of purity offered by DAWs. DAWs are simply easier for reasons we usually don’t even think about these days. Last but not least, the analog studio — at least the incarnation of it we could afford ’cause the majority of us wasn’t awfully rich — was never as flexible as an avarage DAW. The number of things you can do in a box, possible routings, instances of a single plugin you can use, finally the accessibility of plugins doing literally anything you dream of for free or for a fraction of the price of a hardware processor makes a real difference if you think about it. Hence I’d always pick a modern DAW today, maybe with some necessary hardware if I really needed it, but frankly speaking I try to keep things as simple as possible. With plugins being better and better you can do a lot and more, for less and in a limited space of your bedroom. With demanding and pricy hardware life isn’t always better. It’s just my two cents though.
Nacho Ruiz
onNo!
jonas souza
onIf I had money, yes!
Kacper Żarna
onNot at this point in my path – i’d need to gain a lot of knowledge beforehand!
Youri
onYes, absolutely !
JoeB
onI would not go analog. I don’t have the space. As long as plugins like the Tascam Series are developed, there is no reason to go back to analog.
Alex
onNo. I would like to have best of both worlds!
Aaron
onsi y no , si por que seria un sueño y no por que no tengo un estudio y tal ves jamas lo tenga xd
Alberto Lucendo
onthe fun of performance with the buttons and the touch of the gear is hard to get just with plugins, but everytime plugins are sounding better and better and affordable and also good looking :) so it’s becaming a compromise ant tempting to mobr to a mostly digital enviroment.
yokyun
onPING PONG Recording!
Anastasiya
onNo
Lucas Cordeiro
onYes I would switch because my favorite albums were recorded in analogue studios
JEFFERSON ALMEIDA
oncreo que lo haría en un 50/50 digital y hardware para sacar lo mejor de ambos mundos
Richard Weeks
onI’d love to but I think hybrid is the most practical these days for me. That said, why not both!?
Tiago Herbert de Araujo
onNão trocaria todos. Pois a manutenção dos analógicos é muito cara.
Xavier
onNope, there’s a sound reason why, lol.
Greg
onNo, I wouldn’t
Timothy
oni would if i submitted an indie track type for mastering..for artists like finneas or the neighbourhood
Quim Mandado
onNo, I don’t
ege
onOf course i would haha
Edison Rosa
onI’d like to, but I wouldn’t have enough money to do that. So I’d keep digital.
Kyle Pivarnik
onYes, I absolutely would!
Joe L.
onBack in the day I would go full analog in a heartbeat… but now, no I wouldn’t… everything has become so streamlined there’s no going back.
Luiz
onSim
MIchel Assunção
onNão trocaria de jeito nenhum! Não teria espaço no meu quarto!!!
Terry Sanders
onNo, there’s enough to keep me me busy with updates, new plugins, etc. While the hardware would be sweet and from my age group and time, the possible wiring/routing hassles, parts repair, cost factor, etc. would no longer be worth the trade off.
jeyz1176
onNo, I could never go back.
Nevertheless I religiously keep my analog equipment … Do we ever know 😅
mayito
onI love my gear, don’t think I can go fully analog anytime soon!
Ashish Vineeth Manuel
onNo, I don’t
Vladimir
onnope
Eye Jaw
onI don’t think I could permanently work with a strictly analog studio.
imoyes
onI have gone from fully analogue recording (when I started there was no option!) to pretty much fully digital recording (my guitars & voice are still analogue!), and I have no intention of going back! :-)
David N
onYes, I would – if by some unexpected miracle I suddenly became rich enough.
Until then, I’ll stick with a hybrid approach, while my last remaining tape cassette machines
continue to survive on their last legs.
Pablo Osso
onI guess I don’t but if I ID ont have any option, of course I’d have a full analog studio
Alexandre Munhoz Scherer
onAcho que não trocaria pelo fato da manutenção. Hoje em dia é bastante complicado já no ITB a manutenção, o que dirá no analógico.
Anderson Girotto
onYes, I would.
Ramin Jafarzadegan
onI don’t think so
Frank Wilson
onNo, I don’t
Daniel Guerra
onSería un sueño algo así, espero poder lograrlo.
Francisco Porras
onno !! never !! !!
James
onNo, I wouldn’t. It would be tempting but not being able to switch between projects would be a nightmare. Recalls and all that. And much more expensive
Martin Victor
onI firmly believe in the digital recording realm and I’d never want to leave it after learning it, using it and reaping its benefits for 20 years. That said, I also believe in analog instruments and prefer them to their digital counterparts. Tube amps for guitars and basses, and tube preamps in Hammond organs and Leslie speakers. I love acoustic drums too. I have heard newer Roland electronic drums that sound quite good though, and would give serious consideration to using that type of kit and forego the nightmare of microphone setup and drum tuning to achieve that killer drum sound. And I do have a digital piano which sounds great too. It certainly beats paying for a piano tuner.
Alexander León
onOf course, today it has been demonstrated that software has elements that hardware does not and that it is possible to mimic the behavior of hardware.
Roberto Alves
onNo, I don’t.
But a mix between the both worlds is the best option!
n4m
oni like having the best of both worlds
Regis Caron
onI would definitely
AM
onI ll try if dint like I ll switch back .
Miguel Angel Rodriguez
onNo I do not. Because today technology is so advanced that the difference between digital and analog is minimal.
Michael Le Du
onI would not. Digital is too convenient and the difference isn’t going to be noticeable to the average listener.
Arnold Ulloa
onNo, considero que las emulaciones de plugins de UAD, aparte de ser mas económicas, tienen un sonido mas fiel al original. Tal vez compre algunos complementos análogos, pero no sustituirlos al 100%
Mibrilane
onProbably not, editing in digital is just so easy. Analog would force choices, though, and sometimes that’s a good thing.
Alex
onNot sure I could trade the digital for an analog studio. Maybe like a simple eight track tape recorder. That’d be pretty dope.
Joel Glaser
onWould I ever substitute my digital studio for an entirely analog one? Well, no. Quite frankly, I love the analog gear that I own, but software and digital gear is getting better every year. There may be some that can afford to buy and maintain analog bits, but most of us don’t have that budget. And truthfully, most of us aren’t making the types of recordings where it would make any noticeable difference.
Thanks for putting the BPB newsletter together. I do enjoy it.
Happy Holidays!
Charles B
onWould you ever substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one?
– Now that plugins like these are already created, there’s no need for an entirely analog setup. Gosh, that TASCAM Porta One is the only missing piece in my low-end digital setup! Thank you IK, thank you Bedroom Producer Blog! ( I visit your site everyday! )
Simbarashe Motsi
onI would have both, the best of both worlds. That said i can do without the hardware.
Giovanni Berto
onTo be honest, no
Alexandr
onNo. But I would buy something from the analogue. All the same, the sound is captured in the analogue part. However, with regard to processing – only ITB.
Eve Ripper
onI would try that to make sure it’s good or bad
Pavel Gorlovoy
onMaybe yes. At least to work on some special project.
For everyday use – this would not work in today’s realities.
Kurauwone Maponga
onNo I wouldnt do that. I am now deeply rooted in digital.
Alex Vombat
onNo, I would not
Krishna Seth
onNo I don’t , this is a digital era of music !
Carlos Álvarez Rodriguez
onNo. First at all, I work in home-studio, so my space to hardware is limited. Also, digital emulation is more realible and is hard to damage,
Dee Gee
onIf the world resets to 1963, then YES.
Jay
onwould you give away your petrol car for an electric one?
Chris
onIf space and money were no option, I WOULD trade! but sometimes it would take a few hours to get from one piece of equipment to another…
CRISTOBAL
onNo. I’d not.
Philipp
onI would never substitute my digital studio for an entirely analog one…
Darren Jennings
onI wouldn’t swap it completely, as it would hurt my workflow too much. But nothing wrong with an analog tape machine and compressor in my studio one day.
Gavs
onNope. No space for an analogue studio.
Eliot
onNope, way to used to the convenience!
Fernando
onNo, I think with such a busy schedule there is only so much time for me personally to make music. The quality in low end is closer than ever before to emulate analog and the fun of spending a weekend purchasing plugins is in itself a wonder! The resolution and quality of emulations is amazing for sure!
Thank you for this blog and IK for your amazing software!
Clay LaHatte
on“Would you ever substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one?”
I don’t think so.
Dennis
onNo, although analog sounds awesome, I wouldn’t step back. Digital has too many advantages :-)
Lars
onProbably only when i have the money to buy a big house with enough roomspace to put in all that analogue gear
shun
onYes I do.
yambu
onyes I would, because I come from the analogy era. But I also don’t want to do without a digital studio anymore. I like both. Can you forgive me?
Black
onI never try, but, I would love to reserch more tone of sound to create more song’s styles.
Leo Wieber
onNo I wouldn’t, it is great that we can use both digital and analog nowadays (and its impressive to see how good digitally emulated analog gear has become !
Váradi Ádám
onNo, digital is the future. smaller environment pollution important too.
Andrew Hall
onNever say never…!
Segun Adigun
onno
Jason
onIf I have the real deal equipment ? Sure. I could see people who are making music in the box not living this idea, but having full on tape with a good board and all the outboard ? It would be like recording with Steve Albini in Electrical Audio.
Alex
onEntering contest and answering : no, I would never play it 100% Analog !
yiyao
onNo, I would not
Guo
onNope~
Emmieeee
onI don’t think it’d be great for my music, short term. Swapping to 100% analogue would be a huge adjustment and not something I’m motivated to do. If it was more of a case of working alongside someone who knows the equipment and getting an opportunity to try a different way of working and learn from others then, yeah, absolutely. Never say never, and all that.
Matt
onNo.
Bsprt
onSimple answer: no way. I would first have to learn how to cope with analogue equipment from the scratch, I guess. And then have the money and space to aquire and place the equipment. That’s not realistic for me.
Corey
onNo, probably not. It’s best to appreciate and utilise both for what they each do best.
Tim Fialka
onIt makes no sense to change everything to analog, but some things remain unique.
Matthias
onNa, I wouldn t do that : )
Sven
onIch würde bestimmte Komponenten weiterhin analog bevorzugen ( z.B. Compressor). Viele andere, wie z.B. Synthis können ruhig digital sein. Der ideale Weg ist eine Mischung aus beiden. Das ist jedenfalls der aktuelle Stand. Vielleicht ist es in Zukunft wieder anders und die analogen Komponenten verschwinden komplett. Interessant wird auch wie sich die KI in diesem Bereich zukünftig entwickeln wird.
Oleksii Kalashnyk
onNo
Thorsten Meinhardt
onThere’s no way back;)
Sami
onThanks
Kevin Ingham
onI wish I could afford to, so no, it’s very unlikely, but I wish I could have more analogue gear as it’s so much fun to play with tactile equipment.
Arnaud
onYes, I will perhaps, one day, reuse my Tascam 244, 4 tracks cassette recorder !
KING BOLART
onNO, I WOULD NOT.
Mike
onCouldn’t go fully analogue in this day and age. Digital is just too convenient!
Angie Angel
onI maybe would if could afford it
Szilárd K.
onNo I would not.
pedro sanchez
onI Don’t know but it sounds attractive, having all this beautiful machines around
Dmitry
onMaybe
Oberst
onNo. Digital got a lot of advantages and is much cheaper.
gra
onNo, I would not
LU
onno nn I would, it would be nice to have everything analog but the power of digital is now almost unbeatable nowadays, it never fails, I put as many as I want and if I knew how to use they give perhaps better results than the old analog
Gunnar
onI would not leave my digital studio, because of the comfort to recall everything, what is not possible in a total analog envirounment.
Klaus
onIt would be great to be able to do this. But in 2021 we have the possibility to work around with emulations like the Tape Machines of Ik Multimedia. I think that’s great, too, to be able to combine old school recording with modern producing. It is a very good approach for creativity, really creating something new and not just recalling the good old times.
Alexey
onNo
Pedro Deniz
onNo, I don’t
Jacques Boileau
onNo I would not! I am doing so much more in the digital realm.
Javier
onI don’t have any, but I would love to use a digital emulation, I can’t afford a real one, and if I could, I’d try to switch to digital because of simplicity
Leandro Fernandez
onNo I would not
Denis
onActually yes, but only because I have dry eyes and staring at a computer screen for hours is not good for me (but I’m still staring :-) )
Anthony Junior
onHaving T-RackS TASCAM Tape Collection in my arsenal is as well having analogue in my digital box, so what else? what is Analogue again? no substitution any more and save space ,
Matt
onYes I would, then I’d sell all that lovely gear and with teary eyes get myself setup with a killer mobile digital setup so that I could work while traveling. I think as much as I love analogue gear it still doesn’t compare to being in studio with a talented new artist, in a city you’ve never been to before exploring the one thing that brings us all together… the process of making music!
Ardon
onMaybe for certain Analogue gear but predominantly would be still all ITB!
R
onanalog tape echo!!
HPN
onIf money ain’t no issue, I would! Cause it would take so much cpu to achieve fully analog result. Analog recordings can convert to any bit modern Technology offers, just like tape movies are now in 4k or 8k.
Andy
onI wouldn’t mainly because of the automation and recall features of the entire signal chain.
Gioacchino
onEntirely analog one? Too expensive and complex for a home studio.
Of course you can add some hardware in some case to improve your music.
Anyway thanks to bpb and ik multimedia for the giveaway.
Cheers!
Ashley Marlow
onTo be honest I kinda would! All the limitations and charm analog midi devices have would make my workflow a little simpler, and probably could get some nice oldskool jungle with a little practice. Ambient and noise sessions would be amazing in a analog-only studio too :D
Frank Taylor
onNo. I guess I’m addicted to the software convenience
SorooshMHS
onI would not
Lukas J. Knaup
onWould I replace my digital studio with an entirely analog one? No. Reason being the ease of using a daw. Thats not to say I don’t love being hands on, I think Im more creative hands on and ultimately I would love a hybrid studio! Ah one day…
So many entries for this giveaway. Good luck everyone!
Fabio
onsorry, no
Sinan oğuz
onYes I would like to use
Progtronic
onNope…
Used my old hardware studio for years. Things I had to deal with on a daily basis were bad cables/connections, backing up individual devices samples, programs, sequence data & whatnot… and just generally trying to get things sounding the same from the previous days session.
Once I went digital… I went all-in, in-the-box… and haven’t looked back.
Johnathan Glass
onI couldn’t at this point, even though I started on tape in a fully analog studio in 2000.
Johnathan Glass
onI couldn’t at this point, even though I started on tape in a fully analog studio in 2000. Digital has too many advantages in speed and flexibility.
Ale Kami
onTes, definitively, I would do it. A nice analog gear y much more sweet than a computer setup.
Julien
onNever. For home studio, mix in the box is perfect :-)
Valerio
onno, I prefer travelling with my studio in a bag.
Charles Kerper
onI would and I have. To be stuck in one or the other is bipolar and unnecessary. We have the luxury of living at a time when we have both. I recall the fun of PortaStudios and there was a magic that is not the same with digital; but the same can be said of the reverse.
Regardless Tascam created some of the most used and loved recorders just prior to the digital revolution and its nice to see them get props.
John Murphy
onYes, it might be fun!
Rachmann
onYes, I would. There is a sound that an all analog studio would evoke that, although not intrinsically better than the sound achieved by a totally ITB studio, had its own merit and cadre of fans whom prefer that sound.
Roberto
onNo
Lorax
onNo, I’m a totally digital person. I wouldn’t mind digitalizing myself if it was possible.
Egons Kronbergs
onNo, I would not.
opoil
onImpossible!
Arcílio
onYes!
Alexey Vasilyev
onI think I would prefer hybrid between analog and digital. And it would be more analog and just a little digital.
Matías
onIf, without a doubt, by having digital tools we often focus more on “correcting” and “improving” production factors that may not be the most suitable, with fewer possibilities in the analog environment, it is more important to be well prepared to record and enforce a production only with what is at hand, the execution of the instruments, the production and the audio chain, with these elements should be more than enough.
Matías
onYes, of course. Undoubtedly, having digital tools many times we focus more on “correcting” and “improving” production factors that may not be the most suitable, with fewer possibilities in the analog environment, it is more important to be well prepared To record and enforce a production only with what is at hand, the execution of the instruments, the production and the audio chain, with these elements should be more than enough.
Riley
onYes, I would substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one.
Jael Alesander
onDefinitivamente no.
Es buena la combinación de ambos mundos.
xul Rether
onCouldn’t do it, have done some stuff to tape and would not use it when it comes to editing, may run tracks and mixes to it. I think the method of analog recording is extremely important as the limitations help move things along and kill indecisiveness.
Daniel Ene
onYes I will. It will be a new experience for me.
stiffmink
onyes I would
Niklas Meier
onNo, I’m sure you can do everything in the box.
TDOL
onNo – not enough room in my studio.
thingahangwi avheani
onno
Francesco
onNo, I like software more.
Francesco
onyes, to sell it and be rich!
Ghislain Caya
onYes I would
Pete
onYes, I would to avoid the tendency to tweak things past the point of usefulness.
Andreas Berg
onYes, I’m sure it’ll be a step forward for me.
Kevin Domosbian
onHard question honestly but today I wouldn’t
Arthur
onNo, the only thing I need is my laptop.
Michael
onYes I do
Anna Kowalska
onNo, it might be good to sound quality, but I just don’t feel I want to make things more complex.
Nils Åkesson
onI would have loved to. I guess I would have grown a large fetish (and ‘nerdishment’) for outboard.
But my start in the world of music production coincided with the DigiDesign/Pro Tools era.
And my career never took me towards analog gear.
But I would have loved to work on a big desk and a 24 track R&R – well at least a bigger set-up, than the
Tascam 244 porta I once had ;-)
Now all thats analog, are my mic-pre’s a couple with tubes.
But at least I also have an analog juvel in my rack: Phonic T8300 Tube enhancer.
Anyway – had a stroke 9 years back, so I can no longer manage anything other than digital.
Jon Drucker
onIf someone were to set it up for me, and pay for all of it, and instruct me as to how everything works, then yes, sure!
rodrigo morais
onDefinitivamente não
Z-Rock
onNo. While the idea of an all analog studio is appealing in some ways, I am just too much of a plug-in junkie and have become too accustomed to digital recording to be willing to trade it.
Leandro Moya
onNo, Hybrid system for ever.
Daniel Chin
onNO, I would rather go fully digital than fully analog! xD
Camilo
onHmmm, no.
german
onno, por el simple hecho de que la tecnología avanza y los espacios son cada vez mas reducidos
german
onno, la practicidad ante todo!
Chris Dunnett
onNo I would not. There is far too much flexibility and ease of workflow in today’s digital world. Not to mention that most plug ins emulate analog gear close enough and add great features like presets :)
Aleksei
onI think a hybrid setup is the way to go.
Good luck to everyone!
Freddy Godoy
onI wouldn’t change it, maybe hybrid
mostafa ayman
onyes, absolutely will
Jeslan
onMaybe. Most probably hybrid instead.
Rohit Raj Raina
onI would say, a hybrid studio would be the best option. I will never transform my studio to completely analogue.
Janne
onA hybrid would be the best! The possibility to record / bounce tracks to analog and mix on the digital.
MJ
onNope. Plugins are MANY times cheaper, considering from where I’m from.
Igor
onNever 😊
Curtis
onYes way.
JaX
onI would, but only if I could go back in time to 70s ;)
ALex
onProbably Yes in future
Albert
onI think no.
Jon Drucker
onHow does this set of tape machine emulations compare to IK’s own set of 4 tape machines that they already offered as a part of T-Racks, I wonder? Wondering how the performance compares for each set, and whether it’s worth it for me to spend $130 on the TEAC/Tascam set
Tracy
onHELL no!
Richy Ross
onNo I don’t, but I love analog and digital, both twice!
Brugug
onNo, I wouldn’t. But if I had tons of money and space, I’d like to have both.
Ralf H
onNever, I started fully digital and will keep it that way.
Tobi Ve
onDon’t think so, my tiny apartment would not be happy. Nor would my wife. Or my cat. Well, maybe he would, and mixes could go to the unexpected.
Shebil
onNo, I won’t go fully analog
Juan Ramon Guiu
onSi, porque no me encanta lo analogico, me encanta lo digital
samuel
oni would absolutely not! i’d add a lot of analogness to my setup, but keeping the heart of it all digital
Paulo Matos
onNo, absolutely not!
Jordan O
onProbably not, as digital is what I’m familiar with. I’d add outboard gear in a heartbeat, but I couldn’t get rid of my computer. Thanks for the opportunity to win one of your nice products.
Enrique
onI’m familiar with digital, as I have used FL Studio for a while, so it would be a glaring change to analog only… Maybe just outboard gear to get to use the best of both flavors
Thennarasu
onNowadays digital was unavoidable. If I was in 80s, I can use only analog. But we are in 20th century, we have to accept and adopt the technology.
jim
onNo, Hybrid is the go!
olsson
onnot completely, I prefer a hybrid. Also, today it is not crazy to say that digital is similar or superior to analog in some cases
Kamau Shomari
onNo chance
Jonathan
onI would definitely change it all to analogue if I could have the space (not speaking of the costs for the original instruments and gear) so basically – gimme some hundreds of thousands of dollars/euros/ pounds (I’ll take some millions of Yen too if that should be the only option) and I promise to switch all till the beginning of 2022 :)
Johnnie
onNo I wouldn’t.
Genaro
onno I would not and less having accessories vst T-RackS
Ho Shui
onNo, I don’t .
moi non plus.
JimK
onProbably not.
Carlos
onLa tecnología avanza a pasos agigantados el software esta casi a la par que el hardware y creo que por comodidad, espacio, costo/beneficio no lo cambiaría.
FARES
onNo i don’t think the digital brings too many benefits
Dmitry
onHm… Now sure. Maybe analog gear can became handy, so why not? So far I use mixed both: analog and digital stuff, hardware and software.
Gris
onI dont think I would
Diego Rengifo
onNo, I would not
Patrick W.
onWould you ever substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one?
– Yes, I would :D
Haggai Rongmei
onNope, I’d rather stay hybrid and updated.
James Elliott
onYes. It would be a nice idea to break away from a screen!
Joost
onYour question: “Would you ever substitute your digital studio for an entirely analog one?”
My answer: “No… I am using the good stuff that some analog gear brings and the nice benefits that digital hardware and software brings. So hybrid for me. I can’t efficiently distribute my work though analog devices either ;-)”
Good luck all on this nice giveaway!
Jannes
onI wouldn’t wanna work solely in a completely analog studio. I love the color and feel that you can get from analog hardware, but I also love the huge amount of possibilities, as well as the ease of use, in digital mixing.
Sarj
onIt’ll depend on the analog hardware I’ll get to work with.
Trex Themm
onNo,I wouldn’t replace it.
Andy Skinner
onI learned on old fostex and tascam multi tracks, my daw has a few things i couldnt ever do on non digital equiptment, but if i had to go back id be happy to.
Giulio Jimenez
onOf course I would! But only if I could bring back Bruce Swedien, Rudy Van Gelder, Al Schmitt, Tom Dowd and all of the amazing engineers that worked on the fully analog world!! But we would have to travel in time, because how could we get any work these days?
Esteban
onProbably not. Digital technology is too convenient and makes things flow easily
Carlos Melguizo
onProbably yes, an entirely analog studio gets you to work differently, Doing everything digitally is very convinient, but it can really affect your workflow. Plus, it would be encredibly fun to put together and to play with every single piece of gear until it breaks hehe :)
Aldair Ramos
onYes, of course!
Bret
onYes, but then I’d sell everything for a profit and go digital again
eegoal nice
onMyabe
Andreas
onNo, would probably not
Robualdo Righetti
onToo much money for an analog studio. I read bedroomproducersblog for free digital gear so….not interest for analog.
flatkaneda
onDigital wins the space war, but I’d miss the sights (and smell) of the valves
Marcis
onI would
Cool WAV
onNo I wouldn’t, but if I could have a 2nd studio setup that was fully analog that would be dope!
Estevao Christmann
onuh, nope!
Kiran Dotson
onSure! Analog is cool. That’s why software trying to emulate it.
Abraham Padilla
onI could consider that only if I had the best analog equipment, a great sounding room, a good technician and a lot of money to maintenance. But most of musicians are now working on the box so I would need a good computer, DAW and plug ins in order to get lin to them. I think right now it would be almost impossible for any studio to work exclusevly in the analog world. In fact the hibrid aproach, using good analog equiptment to record, some good processors and good plug ins and emulators will give us a very professional sound that everybody is looking for. Thanks for your effort. I value all your posts and the links to free or discounted material. Thanks for the TASCAM.
Ikechi
onNah. I wouldn’t
Sophia
onI would if I had a space here for an analog studio setup! For now, I am going with my digital setup.
Mike
onNo I won’t do that
tusca
onTotally yes! Analog gear brings all that grit, noise, distortion and misty to the circuits! Thanks!
renato
onDepende, si el cliente quiere un sonido asi, si lo haria
Davi Santos
onNo!
Kendall Wilson
onNo, I don’t have the room for the outboard gear.
Romeo - Israel's masked musician
onI WOULD.
It’s all about the ear and less about how you got used to your gear. Open minded approach is a game changer. and analog is not a curse. It can FEEL wow.
Muchas Gracias for your generous offer, IK. You may never know when it may change someone’s life.
Gabriele
onNEVAAA
Filip
onNope!
bein
onabsoutely not!
Savuon
onNo, because I would need a room full of 1176s.
David
onNo. Analog gear uses too much electricity.
Praveen PA
onNo.That would be added one..
Yerko Paniagua Lobo
onComo toda persona sin recursos para comprar algo analógico me llamaría la atención aprender de ese mundo analógico, conocer su “color y sabor”, hasta el momento será todo digital, pero seguramente debe ser toda una experiencia, sin duda.
Daniel Smith
onI would prefer more physical than digital since I am a more hands on type of person. If I had to choose I may go with physical. As difficult as it may be it would be for the experience and authenticity of it all. I’m no purist by any means and prefer hybrid but if given the choice that’s what I would go with. Definitely more expensive but a better experience for sure. This article got me thinking too, I was about to get the wavesfactory tape plug-in but I may reconsider now!
redmoai
onIt’s fun to build such a special system!
Daniel J Fontes
onAs someone who still has a TEAC A-3340S and wouldn’t mind playing around on a 388, yes. I appreciate the sound of both recording methods. Granted, I do see the current “revival” could come to an end for the simple reason that there aren’t as many companies making the blank tape, making it FAR more expensive than it was when I was recording on my deck back in the early 90s, and replacement parts for the old machines are getting harder to come by, as I’ve heard (not to mention, I don’t know of anyone making NEW machines, or making them affordable for that matter) so I’m sure this time will come to a close. It’s too bad. I think it’s come to represent a different method of artistic expression, like filming in black and white, using vintage or boutique analog synths or virtual ones or using real film (even choosingeither 35mm or 70mm) or shootinga movie digitally, or even the choice between tube guitar amps and solid state ones. Unfortunately, with analog recording equipment there isn’t the same weight behind its use as, let’s say 35mm or 70mm film over digital.
L
onIf I had the space and the money, yes
Russ
onwould I? No, space (and cost) and reliability. In the box for me thanks!
Ronald Irawan
onYes, if thats an API Console
Kieran Roche
onI wouldn’t , both Analog and digital work better together
Davis Hill
onI would be perfectly happy to do a hybrid setup (actually that would be preferred), but I couldn’t switch to all analog. I wold miss so many things…
tonny
onno, absolutely not
jermaine
onnormally id just say no, but this deserves a HELL NO
Brad
onI wouldn’t
Ben
onno way